I do not endorse Wikipedia vandalism.

However, every statement in the first paragraph of this particular revision of the entry is true.

2 Responses to “I do not endorse Wikipedia vandalism.”

  1. Nick J Says:
    1

    That link doesn’t work (for me, at least). A proper wikipedia diff link ends in something like this: “title=Stephen_Harper&diff=36588612&oldid=36588593″

  2. Mr. McLaren Says:
    2

    Still works for me, and has worked for quite a few other folks who have had a laugh.

    The link is not to a diff, but to a specific revision, so does not need two different version IDs. This is the kind of link you would get browsing through the “previous version” links in the article.

    However, just to be on the safe side, here’s an absolute link to the version (which works for me):

    http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephen_Harper&oldid=36469990

    And, if you really must see a diff, instead of just looking at the specific entry, here’s the link for a diff of that specific rev against the previous one:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephen_Harper&diff=36469990&oldid=36469748

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Quicktags:

The odds are very good that comments submitted with JavaScript turned off will be flagged as spam.