<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adaptations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrismclaren.com/blog/2006/04/21/adaptations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrismclaren.com/blog/2006/04/21/adaptations/</link>
	<description>As honest as a gambling man can be</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John DeNardo</title>
		<link>http://www.chrismclaren.com/blog/2006/04/21/adaptations/#comment-3798</link>
		<dc:creator>John DeNardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrismclaren.com/blog/archives/2006/04/21/adaptations/#comment-3798</guid>
		<description>There are reasons why adaptations differ from the sourc material.  The main reason is that film is an entirely different medium than paper and offers different challenges and methods of storytelling that don not necessarily translate.  If I may drop a sjameless plug, we've talked about this beofre over at SF Signal - see http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/001872.html.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are reasons why adaptations differ from the sourc material.  The main reason is that film is an entirely different medium than paper and offers different challenges and methods of storytelling that don not necessarily translate.  If I may drop a sjameless plug, we&#8217;ve talked about this beofre over at SF Signal - see <a href="http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/001872.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/001872.html</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
